Sean Thomas White
2020-09-19 13:25:43 UTC
reverse backcrosses(blind catching behind back) are harder in my opinion
I second that motion. Continuous behind the back (=back crosses?) is by
far the most difficult pattern with 3 for me (and probably most other
people). I only get 20-30 catches on a good run with this. The control
needed for this is very high and difficult to achieve. I always have to
concentrate to do it whereas the "in front" patterns are easy enough to
relax. I think that RR,MM, and BB aren't even close in difficulty to
continuous behind the back.
Of course you can always pile on more difficult things (eyes closed,
hopping,etc) but I don't think that is what the poster is looking for.
They just wanted a "pure" pattern. If anything behind the back doesn't
qualify as "pure", then I'd nominate RR...
jason
--
--Woah?! How many is that?
I think it really depends... I learned Mill's Mess and Chops before even learning Juggler's Tennis.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Back crosses (IMO). It's the only one I know of that I can't do
solidly.I second that motion. Continuous behind the back (=back crosses?) is by
far the most difficult pattern with 3 for me (and probably most other
people). I only get 20-30 catches on a good run with this. The control
needed for this is very high and difficult to achieve. I always have to
concentrate to do it whereas the "in front" patterns are easy enough to
relax. I think that RR,MM, and BB aren't even close in difficulty to
continuous behind the back.
Of course you can always pile on more difficult things (eyes closed,
hopping,etc) but I don't think that is what the poster is looking for.
They just wanted a "pure" pattern. If anything behind the back doesn't
qualify as "pure", then I'd nominate RR...
jason
--
--Woah?! How many is that?
I think it really depends... I learned Mill's Mess and Chops before even learning Juggler's Tennis.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.